Shostakovich and Mahler at the QEH![]() ![]() I'm not familiar with the Shostakovich: I can't say I was much taken with it. Much of it is slow and rather meandering, and the lively sections sound a bit Shostakovich-by-the-yard, with the familiar tricks - unison angular tunes with varying keys, with much use of xylophone. However it was very well played: the soloist was Sergey Khachatryan. Last week I commented on the warm acoustic of the hall smearing the complex Milhaud piece. Interestingly, Mahler's orchestration - presumably written with a reverberant concert hall in mind - was completely clear and the warm acoustic worked well. The work uses a huge orchestra - 8 double-bass, 8 horns, 5 trumpets, 4 clarinets, 2 tympanists and so on - so the stage was pretty packed. The performance was exciting and very well performed, though I do take issue with one or two points in the conducting: in the first movement the horns were too loud in some of the counterpoint melodies; in the second movement - the Ländler - I felt it was fractionally too slow, just enough to make it seem a little sluggish. The third movement is a parody funeral march based round a melody very close to Frère Jacques, and I felt that de Burgos pulled the tempi around a little too much - on the whole this movement should be taken at a steady tempo. The last, spectacular, movement was excellent and got a well-deserved ovation. Click here to see a larger version of the picture Posted: Wed - June 28, 2006 at 09:29 AM by Roger Wilmut |
Quick Links
About Me:
Roger Wilmut XML/RSS Feed
MY PODCAST
Archives
Calendar
Blogroll
WEBRINGS
Statistics
Total entries in this category: Published On: Mar 11, 2016 05:00 PM |